White Rose Student Research Contest

Questions about the contest?

Contact Laura Patton, via email or 913-327-8236.

Contact Laura
Questions about the contest?

Contact Laura Patton, via email or 913-327-8236.

Contact Laura

About the Contest

The 2025-2026 contest theme is
PROPAGANDA

Propaganda is the use of persuasive communication to influence the thoughts, emotions, and behaviors of a group of people. Propaganda may promote positive social goals, such as convincing people not to smoke cigarettes or drink and drive. Propaganda is often used in advertising campaigns that convince us we will improve our game if we wear certain shoes or be more healthy if we eat a particular brand of cereal. Propaganda is frequently used by politicians to earn our votes.

In 21st century America, the word propaganda carries a connotation that makes us uneasy. We equate it with manipulation for nefarious purposes. Much of this perspective is born out of the propaganda from World War II – especially the propaganda created by the Nazis.

During the Nazi period, propaganda was used for a variety of purposes. The Nazi Party used it to persuade Germans to vote for their party’s platform. They used propaganda to gain the loyalty of the “Aryan” German people, convincing them that the Nazi Party was improving the quality of their lives. The Nazis also used propaganda to encourage people in a highly integrated German society to regard some neighbors as inferior – worthy of exclusion and, eventually, annihilation.

Propaganda will be used as long as humans communicate, but we don’t have to let it harm people. By studying the ways the Nazis used propaganda and making connections with how propaganda is used currently, we can make choices to avoid its negative effects.

Contest Prompt

A successful essay or documentary entry will address both portions of the following prompt. At minimum, one-fourth of the finished work must be devoted to the REFLECTION.

RESEARCH: Analyze at least two examples of Nazi propaganda—one designed to promote inclusion and another designed to enforce exclusion. For each example, consider when it was produced, its intended goals, and the propaganda devices employed. Who was the target audience for inclusion, and who was excluded?

REFLECTION: Having learned about how propaganda can promote inclusion or exclusion, how does this impact how you consume and evaluate media today?

Sources of Information

Background Knowledge: Propaganda

MCHE urges contestants to gain foundational knowledge about propaganda before exploring the contest documents. The secondary sources listed below are intended to help students gain this understanding. They are not to be considered among the five contest-required sources. However, students may cite ideas or primary sources contained within these works as additional sources of information for their essay or documentary.

  • Propaganda Critic.
    This website is a student-friendly, deep-dive into propaganda. Teachers are encouraged to provide guidance. The authors of the site strive to address – in an unbiased manner – questions like: What is propaganda? What is bias? Who uses propaganda and why? What are some common propaganda techniques? What are some case studies and examples? How can I identify propaganda when I see it?
    NOTE: If you use information from Propaganda Critic, please refer to the “Citing Propaganda Critic” page on their website.
  • State of Deception: The Power of Nazi Propaganda. USHMM. Online Exhibition.
    This exhibition explores the Nazis’ use of propaganda. Students may cite a primary source (i.e. poster, photo, video clip) from the exhibit in their essays or documentaries. Students may also cite a quote from the exhibition, providing the title of the specific section of the exhibition where the quote appears.

Educators, the following instructional resources may be helpful in preparing students to research the 2025-26 White Rose contest prompt:

Contest Documents

Nazi Philosophy, Policy & Propaganda “How-To” Documents

Excerpts from Mein Kampf by Adolf Hitler “On the Use of Propaganda” (Chapter 6). 1925. Jewish Virtual Library.

Modern Political Propaganda. 1930. German Propaganda Archive, Calvin University.

Nazi Propaganda Intended for Use with and for Children

Das Deutsche Madel (The German Girl) magazine, 1933-1944. BDM History: BDM Magazines.

Der Pimpf (The German Boy) magazine, 1935-1944. German Propaganda Archive, Calvin University.

Excerpts from “Heredity and Racial Science for Elementary and Secondary Schools.” A teacher’s guide for racial instruction for grades 4 through 8. 1937. German Propaganda Archive, Calvin University.

Der Giftpilz (The Poisonous Mushroom). 1938. German Propaganda Archive, Calvin University.

“Jews Out!” Board Game, 1938. German History in Documents and Images.

Hitler Youth Training Film, undated. USHMM.

Hitler Youth Quotation Posters, 1940. German Propaganda Archive, Calvin University.

Propaganda for General German Audiences

Film of Germans Burning Books, 10 May 1933. USHMM.

Hubert Lanzinger’s The Standard Bearer (c. 1934–36). German Historical Institute Washington.

“But Who Are You? Why and How One Engages in Family and Kinship Research.” Pamphlet. circa 1936. USHMM.

Opening of the 1936 Summer Olympic Games. August 1936. Photo. USHMM.

Photo from a Public Pool in Fürth, Germany. Sign banning Jews, circa 1936. USHMM.

Photograph of a “Strength through Joy” Event at Strandbad Wannsee, 24 April 1937. USHMM.

“Healthy Woman – Healthy Nation.” Film (clip). 1937. USHMM.

Leaflet advertising the Nazi magazine Neues Volk. 1937 or 1938. USHMM.

Front page of the most popular issue ever of Der Stürmer newspaper. 1939. USHMM.

“When You See This Symbol…” Pamphlet distributed with ration cards throughout Germany to justify the 1 Sept 1941 edict that all German Jews wear the yellow star. German Propaganda Archive, Calvin University.

NOTE: Excellent sources that were considered, but not ultimately selected, as contest documents may be found on our PRIMARY SOURCE DOCUMENTS webpage: See “Nazi Propaganda.”

Contest Information

White Rose Contest Guide

MCHE’s White Rose Research Contest Guide is a handy reference in an easy-to-print, PDF format. It provides contest rules, format guidelines, FAQs, and tips for success – written by a teacher who has sponsored White Rose finalists. You will find FAQs and tips in the Guide that aren’t on the website. We encourage all participants and sponsoring teachers to download, save, and refer to the Contest Guide while working on and before submitting their essays and documentaries.

Contest Eligibility

Contest Eligibility Guidelines:

  • The White Rose Contest is open to students enrolled in grades 8 through 12.
  • Entrants may compete in one of two categories–Essay or Documentary.
  • Entrants may compete in one of two age divisions–Lower (8th and 9th grades) or Upper (10th, 11th, and 12th grades).
  • Students may submit one entry in one contest category per year. Students may enter the contest each year they are enrolled in grades 8 through 12. Previous finalists and winners may enter the contest again.
  • Each sponsoring teacher may submit as many as ten of the best essays and as many as ten of the best documentaries created by the students assigned to their classes during a contest year. Please use the contest rubrics when evaluating entries for submission.
Contest Rules
General Contest Rules
  • No portion of the work may be plagiarized–a problem most often caused when information beyond common knowledge is not properly credited.
  • No portion of the work may utilize Artificial Intelligence (AI).
  • Sponsoring teachers may instruct, guide, review, and suggest, but may not rewrite or extensively edit student work.
  • Entries must be submitted through the MCHE website by the contest deadline.
    If you learned about White Rose through a scholarship clearinghouse such as FastWeb, please be sure that you follow all White Rose contest rules and submit your essay through the MCHE website.
  • Entries will not be returned.
  • Entrants give MCHE permission to publish entries.
  • Decisions of the judges are final.
Rules Governing the Use of Sources
  • Contestants must base their entry on at least three of the provided contest documents (sources).
  • In addition, contestants must use at least two additional sources of information obtained through research.
  • All information beyond common knowledge must be cited.
  • Citations must follow Modern Language Association (MLA), American Psychological Association (APA), or Chicago Manual of Style (CMS) format and be consistent throughout the essay or documentary and Works Cited page. The OWL (Online Writing Lab) at Purdue is a good source of information about these style manuals.
  • A Works Cited must be included as the last page of the essay or script. It must list—in alphabetical order—all and only the sources cited within the essay or documentary. The Works Cited need not be included in the word count.
  • Bibliographies are not allowed. (Please make sure you understand the difference between a Works Cited and a Bibliography.)
  • White Rose is a RESEARCH contest. An entry may be disqualified if it has not met the minimum standards for citations described above.
Contest Rules for Essays
  • 1,600 words maximum are allowed for an essay.
  • At minimum, one-fourth of the total length of the essay (400 of 1,600 words) must be reserved for the reflection portion of the contest prompt. The maximum word count need not include the Works Cited.
  • Authors may make limited and judicious use of images such as photographs, diagrams, maps, tables, or musical scores in their essays when doing so would add clarity for the reader and support for the thesis of the paper. (Essayists may not include links to documentation available online.) Refer to the appropriate style manual – MLA, APA, or CMS – for specific guidance. If you would like to see an example, Elwyn Patterson inserted a figure on page 2 of her 2025 winning essay.
  • Essays must be the original work of a single student.
Contest Rules for Documentaries
  • A documentary is an audio/visual presentation that uses many types of sources such as interviews, narration, still images, historical audio and video, and sound effects or carefully selected music to communicate a historical argument, supported by research, and a reflection on this year’s contest prompt.
  • Documentary entries must be submitted as a written script containing a YouTube link to the film. The YouTube link for the documentary must appear underneath the title at the top of the first page of the script. Consult the format guidelines in the Contest Guide for specific information.
  • Scripts do not have a word limit.
  • Documentaries should be at least seven minutes but no longer than ten minutes in length.
  • At minimum, one-fourth of the total length of the documentary (2.5 of 10 minutes) must be reserved for the reflection portion of the contest prompt.
  • The last portion of the documentary must be a list of credits for sources of information, still images, moving images, interviews, music, artwork, etc. These credits may be brief—not full bibliographic citations. It would be helpful if the credits were listed in alphabetical order, matching the Works Cited page.
  • Documentary scripts and films must be the original work of one or no more than two student partners.
Resources for Students & Educators
Help with Thesis Statements

The following resources about thesis statements may be helpful to essayists, documentarians, and educators:

Help with Citations

The following resources about citations may be helpful to students and educators:

Help with Documentaries
How to…

Here is a short video from Lasseter’s Lab titled “How to make a documentary for a school project.” It has solid advice for beginners.

These tips come from the New York Film Academy (NYFA). Titled “How to Write a Documentary Script,” the article describes seven steps and provides an example of a script that we used as a model for our template.

We created this script template for you to use in planning your White Rose documentary entry. This template was made in Word. Save your own copy! Then click and drag the row and column lines to make the cells larger or smaller as needed.

More from NYFA… “How to Prepare and Conduct a Documentary Interview.”

A-roll and B-roll?

Many of these sources above refer to B-roll but don’t explain what that is. B-roll is supplementary film that is used to enhance the primary film (A-roll).

For example, if you are using a clip of survivor testimony, that is your A-roll. You might want to provide the audience with additional visual information (and make your film more interesting) by interspersing historical photos that support the survivor’s testimony. These photos are the B-roll. This 2-minute demo film provides examples. (More info below.)

So, I’ve never made a film before…

Neither had I! This is Laura Patton. This section is going to be a folksy chat.

I had never made a film, even though I have been coordinating White Rose for a while now. I decided I needed to learn a few things.

Before I started, I knew that IWitness from the USC Shoah Foundation is an online learning site that provides access to an extraordinary collection of survivor testimonies. The site allows students to create videos using the testimonies. (Find the Video Editor under the Features tab.) Previously, students and teachers were forced to work entirely within the site – no good for White Rose. But recently, we learned that IWitness had made it possible for students to download their work. I wanted to check this out and see how if might be useful for documentarians. Here is what I learned…

Please open this Screenshot of the IWitness video editor in a side-by-side tab, then note the following things you can see in the picture:

  • You are looking at a screenshot of the video editor for a finished 2-minute film. The film runs across the bottom of the frame. At the far left you will see labels for three rows: Audio 1, Video 1 (the A-roll), and Video 2 (the B-roll).

    I edited a clip of Esther Clifford’s testimony; this was my A-roll or Video 1. I found this video within IWitness; therefore, it saved as “Project Media.” It was originally 1:45 minutes long – way too much of the WR 10 minute allowance. So I played around with using the video editor to cut and paste excerpts of the testimony together. The video editor lets you add transitions between cuts; look for the box divided diagonally in the upper left corner.
  • Sound from the testimony automatically loaded into the audio band of the editor. I only needed to add audio to the beginning and end of my short film. There are audio options built into the editor. You can find them in the upper left corner; look for the musical note icon.
  • To break up the testimony video, and add both information and visual interest to the film, I inserted historical photos in the B-roll. I found these photos at USHMM. They were easy to download into the video editor; they saved as “My Media.” It was simple to slide these images along the bar to make them appear in the film where I wanted them. I also discovered that if I made the images wider, they would stay in the video long enough for people to read them.
  • I am not sure that IWitness is the best way for students to make short films. There were aspects of using the editor that I did not find intuitive. I did plenty of googling to find out how to do things. (Of course, this may simply be because I am old!) However, a big advantage is the access to the Shoah Foundation’s testimonies. I was fairly pleased with my first attempt, which you may view here.
  • If you decide to use the Video Editor, I agree with the advice that it will be easier if you collect the video testimonies and visual elements for the B-roll before you begin.
  • My work in IWitness became easier once I found this Video Editor Guide.

P.S. My short video is not necessarily an example of a documentary for White Rose. My goal was to make a short video that could be used as an illustration of FEAR as a propaganda technique. Mostly, I created the video to learn how to do it.

Contest Information for Educators

MCHE encourages teachers to utilize this research contest as a classroom exercise.

Learn how the White Rose Research Contest fulfills the Common Core State Standards.

Important notes about citations of sources
We use NoodleTools to create citations – in all three formats – for all of the contest documents. We are happy to provide these citations for sponsoring teachers upon request. We learn a few things from this experience:

  • Many of our contest documents do not fit neatly into the categories of sources described by MLA, APA, and CMS.
  • This requires the citation-writer to make judgements about the source, the information available about it, and the demands of the style guide.
  • These decisions are hard for adults with advanced degrees! Although we are expecting to see greater skill from 12th graders than 8th graders, we certainly do not expect any secondary White Rose contestants to have these skills mastered.
  • Primarily, we want students to credit sources – within the entry – for ideas beyond common knowledge. And we want to be able to trace that textual citation to a list of the sources cited. This “giving credit for ideas” is an essential component of all academic research. White Rose is an academic – specifically historical – research contest. We do not care so much – at this point in the students’ development – that every piece of information is in perfect order or that punctuation is perfect.
  • If you have questions about citations or the expectations of the contest, please do not hesitate to ask.

TIP: We find many great sources that we don’t choose for White Rose contest documents. These are linked on our website under RESOURCES – Primary Source Documents.

Important notes about contest entries:

  • Sponsoring teachers may enter up to ten essays and ten documentaries per age division per contest year.
  • If several teachers within the same school work with combined classes of students on the White Rose contest, each of those teachers may submit up to ten essay and ten documentary entries. Please assign one sponsoring teacher to each entry even if the instructional team worked with students collaboratively.
  • Teachers, you are the first White Rose judges! Please use the contest scoring rubrics to determine the most worthy contest candidates among your students’ essays and documentaries.
  • PLEASE read the White Rose Research Contest Guide – especially the information about formatting papers and scripts – and ask your students to do the same.

“Preview the Contest” happened Thursday, November 13 from 6:00 to 8:00 p.m. via Zoom.

Our goals for “Preview the Contest” are:
1) Provide the historical context needed to teach this year’s contest topic
2) Familiarize teachers with the contest documents.
3) Share what is new about the contest this year.
4) Answer teachers’ questions.

A recording of this workshop will not be available. Please sign-up and show up!
We would like this workshop to be as interactive as possible. We think the best way for teachers to gain knowledge about the documents is to read and talk about them – in both small and large groups. You know that this sort of learning experience requires prior planning – which falls apart when people don’t show up. Please RSVP, and please keep your date with us!

Contest Judging

Contest entries will be evaluated in two rounds of judging.

  • Round 1: Every entry will be scored blindly by at least three different volunteer judges using the appropriate (essay or documentary) contest rubric. The three scores derived from Round 1 will be summed. The highest scores in each category and age division will be declared “Finalists” and move on to Round 2.
  • Finalists will be notified 2-3 weeks after the contest deadline and invited to MCHE’s Academic Awards Ceremony.
  • Round 2: The Finalists from each category and age division will be evaluated by a panel of history professors from Kansas City area universities using the appropriate contest rubrics. The members of the panel have remained the same for many years so as to ensure consistency in the quality of White Rose winners over time. This panel will determine the contest winners.

View the scoring rubric for essay entries.

View the scoring rubric for documentary entries.

Contest Prizes

All White Rose Finalists and their sponsoring teachers will be recognized at MCHE’s Academic Awards Ceremony.

Winners of each contest category and age division will be announced at the ceremony. Winners will be asked to read their essays and screen their documentaries for the assembled audience.

Contest winners in each category and age division will receive a $300 prize.

Sponsoring teachers of each winner will be awarded a voucher worth $150 toward the purchase of Holocaust-related books, instructional materials, or professional development opportunities.

Submit Your Entry

PLEASE review the “Format Guidelines for Written Work” in the White Rose Research Contest Guide for Educators and Students before submitting your work. Failure to follow directions causes additional work for MCHE staff. For example… Every entry gets a code number before it goes to the judges. When a student submits an entry as a PDF, we must convert it back to its original file format before we can add that code number. Removing identifying information and cover pages also slows us down.

Please submit one form per contest entry even if two students worked together on a documentary entry.

Entry Deadline: Friday, 27 March 2026 at 11:59 p.m.

What happens after the contest deadline?

  • It will take two to three weeks to complete the first round of judging. The entries that pass from the first round of judging to the second are considered “finalists.”
  • Contest finalists will be personally notified approximately three weeks after the contest deadline. Finalists and their family members will be invited to the Academic Awards Ceremony.
  • All other participants are encouraged to check this webpage for notification of this year’s finalists.
  • Contest winners will be announced at our Academic Awards Ceremony on Tuesday, 5 May 2026.
  • The winning entries will be posted on our website shortly after the awards ceremony.

Do you have questions or need help with White Rose?
Email Laura Patton or call at 913-327-8236.
Generally, Laura works Monday through Thursday, 9 a.m. to 5 p.m.

2024-2025 Contest Winners

2024-2025 Contest Theme: Non-Jewish Victims of Nazi Persecution & Murder

RESEARCH: Describe why and how one category of non-Jewish victims experienced persecution and murder by the Nazis. (You may choose from among the following non-Jewish victims groups: Jehovah’s Witnesses, LGBTQ+, Roma and Sinti, and the Targets of Eugenics.) Provide as an example how that persecution was experienced by at least one person. Also consider whether the group experienced continued persecution during the post-war years.

REFLECTION: How can you apply the learning gained from your research to your developing responsibilities as a citizen in U.S. society?

During the 2024-25, contestants were allowed 1,600-words for essays and 800-words for film introductions – a change from the process paper required the previous year. In both cases, one-fourth of the word allowance was to be reserved for the reflection. The time constraint on documentaries is ten minutes, one-fourth of which must be devoted to the reflection prompt.

Lower Division Essay Winner: December Valdivia

Lower Division Documentary Winner: Olivia Griffis

Upper Division Essay Winner: Elwyn Patterson

Upper Division Documentary Winners: Addison Doyle & Addison Hild

2023-2024 Contest Winners

2023-2024 Contest Theme: Americans and the Holocaust

RESEARCH: Describe the motivations and outcomes of a non-military action or policy taken by the U.S. government or American citizens to address the persecution of European Jews between 1933 and 1945. Discuss how these actions impacted the European Jewish community or Jewish individuals, citing specific examples.

REFLECTION:  Based on your research, what responsibility do you believe the U.S. has toward refugees and immigrants in today’s world?

Note that the word allowance changed during the 2023-24 contest year. Contestants were allowed 1,600-words for essays and 800-words for process papers. In both cases, one-fourth of the word allowance was to be reserved for the reflection. The time restraint on documentaries is ten minutes, one-fourth of which must be devoted to the reflection prompt.

Lower Division Essay Winner: Morgan Franey

Lower Division Documentary Winner: Halen McClure & Walter SumnerDocumentary and Process Paper

Upper Division Essay Winner: Vicky Pan

Upper Division Documentary Winner: Sophia Grantham & Piper RiffeDocumentary and Process Paper

2022-2023 Contest Winners

2022-2023 Contest Theme: Jewish Resistance in the Ghettos

RESEARCH: Describe the goals and obstacles to one specific form of Jewish resistance in the ghettos. Explain how that method was used by one Jewish person or group.

REFLECTION:  Consider the Kansas City Holocaust memorial and Nathan Rapoport’s Memorial to the Warsaw Ghetto Uprising. After researching several types of resistance, why do you think that memorialization disproportionately focuses on armed resistance? How might you elevate forms of non-armed resistance in memorialization efforts.

Note that the word allowance changed during the 2023-24 contest year. 2022-2023 contestants worked within a 1,200-word limit for essays and a 500-word limit for process papers. The time restraints on documentaries have not changed.

Lower Division Essay Winner: Sylvie Idol

Upper Division Essay Winner: Makenzie Brantner

Upper Division Documentary Winner: Braden ThompsonDocumentary and Process Paper

The White Rose Research Contest is sponsored by
members of the Midwest Center for Holocaust Education —
White Rose Benefactor level and above.
Join us! Become an educator or student member for only $25.

The White Rose Resistance

This research contest is named in honor of the White Rose resistance movement of German university students. Hans and Sophie Scholl, Christoph Probst, other friends, and their professor were arrested and executed for distributing leaflets denouncing the policies of the Nazi regime. May memories of these brave young people inspire us to reflect upon our own responsibilities as citizens in a democratic nation.

Photo at Left: Knowing she had been spotted by a custodian, Sophie Scholl threw the remaining anti-Nazi leaflets in her possession from the balcony of this atrium at Munich University. This incident led to her arrest.
Photo at Top: Replicas of White Rose leaflets on the cobblestones at Munich University.

Be a part of our future.

Our mission is to teach the history of the Holocaust, applying its lessons to counter indifference, intolerance, and genocide.

Consider making a gift today.

Donate

Get in touch with us.

5801 West 115th Street STE #106,
Overland Park, KS 66211

(913) 327-8192

info@mchekc.org

Contact Us